McCainiacs go wild!
Can’t say I saw this one coming, however I didn’t pay attention to the hundreds of different poles that they take about every five minutes. From the debates this weekend, he didn’t appear to be the strongest candidate, certainly not the weakest, but not the strongest either with Romney taking that position and Ron Paul taking the former. I would personally have put 1-Romney, 2.5-Mccain/Giuliani, 4-Thompson, 5-Huckabee, and 6-Paul simply based on the Saturday and Sunday debates. 
As for the democrats, it’s “too close to call” right now, but after her breakdown this prior week, I would have picked Obama to win by about 5%, not to have the Hilldabeast ahead by 2% in the initial polls. Also interesting to note is that Democrats seem to be attracting twice as many people to the polls in New Hampshire than the Republicans, which seems to match the 2/1 odds of a Democrat President on many of the betting websites around the world.
To me, this would mean that even if you don’t agree with Romney, you would still have to vote for him if you’re a republican as he’s by far the most electable. He’s the smartest (or at least appears so) on the stage at all times, is the smoothest, and makes you believe he knows what he’s talking about/cares more than any other candidate. He also doesn’t loose his cool, like Huckabee has, when being targeted by other candidates, instead giving a sly smirk clearly stating that he would like to kill the person but resists saying anything.
As for democrats, the same seems true with Obama. With his larger group of younger supporters, he appears to be the most electable and would give any of the republican candidates a real run for their money. He’s the coolest under pressure and people respond well to his messages, regardless of age, but especially the coveted 18-35yr section of “voters.” If he can successfully obtain the vote of this section, he will be a force to be reckoned with.
